41.Raz J. Legal Principles and the Limits of Law // The Yale Law Journal. 1972. Vol. 81, № 5. P. 823-854. DOI: 10.2307/795152.
42.Raz J. About Morality and the Nature of Law // The American Journal of Jurisprudence. 2003. Vol. 48, № 1. P. 1-15. DOI: 10.1093/ajj/48.1.1.
43.Оглезнев В.В. Намерение, действие, ответственность // Аналитическая философия, юридический язык и философия права. Томск : Том. гос. ун-т, 2016. С. 115-125.
44.Оглезнев В.В. Отменяемость и юридический язык: в защиту Г.Л.А. Харта // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Сер. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2014. № 2 (26). С. 161-169.
45.Моисеев С.В. «Понятие права» Герберта Харта // Харт Г.Л.А. Понятие права. СПб. : СПб. ун-т, 2007. С. 269-295.
46.Cherry C. The Limits of Defeasibility // Analysis. 1974. Vol. 34, № 3. P. 101-107. DOI: 10.1093/analys/34.3.101.
47.Somlo F. Juristische Grundlehre. Leipzig : Verlag von Felix Meiner, 1917. 556 s.
48.Frankfurt H.G. Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility // The Journal of Philosophy. 1969. Vol. 66, № 23. P. 829-839. DOI: 10.2307/2023833.
49.Foot P. The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect // Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Berkeley : University of California Press, 1981. P. 19-32.
50.Kane R.A Contemporary Introduction to Free Will. New York ; Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2005. 196 p.
51.Fischer J.M., Kane R., Pereboom D., Vargas M. Four Views on Free Will. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2007. 232 p.
52.Haji I. Compatibilist Views of freedom and Responsibility // The Oxford Handbook of Free Will / R. Kane (ed.). Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 202-228.
53.Clarke R. Libertarian Views: Critical Survey of Noncausal and Event-Causal Accounts of Free Agency // The Oxford Handbook of Free Will / R. Kane (ed.). Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 356-385.
54.Pereboom D. Living without Free Will: The Case for Hard Incompatibilism // The Oxford Handbook of Free Will / R. Kane (ed.). Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 477-488.
55.Fischer J.M. Frankfurt-type Examples and Semi-Compatibilism // The Oxford Handbook of Free Will / R. Kane (ed.). Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 281-308.
56.Ekstrom L. W. Libertarianism and Frankfurt-style Cases // The Oxford Handbook of Free Will / R. Kane (ed.). Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 309-322.
57.Widerker D. Responsibility and Frankfurt-type Examples // The Oxford Handbook of Free Will / R. Kane (ed.). Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 323-334.
58.Мишура А. Поле битвы: свобода воли // Логос. 2016. Т. 26, № 5. С. 19-58.
59.Волков Д.Б. Проблема свободы воли: Обзор ключевых исследований конца XX - начала XXI в. в аналитической философии // Философский журнал. 2016. Т. 9, № 3. С. 175-189. DOI: 10.21146/2072-0726-2016-9-3-175-189.
60.Fischer J.M. Responsibility and the Kinds of Freedom // The Journal of Ethics. 2008. Vol. 12, № 3/4. P. 203-228. DOI: 10.1007/s10892-008-9032-0.
61.Фишер Дж.М. Полукомпатибилизм и его соперники // Логос. 2016. Т. 26, № 5. С. 131-174.
References
аналитический право модель
1.Austin, J. (1995) The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.Kelsen, H. (1949) General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.Kelsen, H. (2015) Chistoe uchenie oprave [Pure theory of law]. Translated from German by M.V. Antonov and S.V. Lyozov. St. Petersburg: Alef-Press.
4.Coyle, S. (2002) Hart, Raz and the Concept of a Legal System. Law and Philosophy. 21 (3). pp. 275-304. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015596412545
5.Coleman, J.L. (1982) Negative and Positive Positivism. The Journal of Legal Studies. 11 (1). pp. 139-164. DOI: 10.1086/467696
6.Hart, H.L.A. (2007) Ponyatieprava [The concept of law]. Translated from English. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University.
7.Hart, H.L.A. (2017) Pripisyvanie otvetstvennosti i prav [The ascription of responsibility and rights]. Translated from English. In: Ogleznev, V.V. & Surovtsev, V.A. (eds) Filosofiya iyazykprava [Philosophy and language of law]. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI Reabilitatsiya.
8.Hart, H.L.A. (2017) Pozitivizm i razgranichenie prava i morali [Positivism and the separation of law and morals]. Translated from English. In: Ogleznev, V.V. & Surovtsev, V.A. (eds) Filosofiya i yazyk prava [Philosophy and language of law]. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI Reabilitatsiya.
9.Hart, H.L.A. (2017) Akty voli i otvetstvennost' [Acts of will and responsibility]. Translated from English. In: Ogleznev, V.V. & Surovtsev, V.A. (eds) Filosofiya i yazyk prava [Philosophy and language of law]. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI Reabilitatsiya.
10.Fuller, L.L. (2012)Moral'prava [The morality of law]. Translated from English. Moscow: IRISEN.
11.Finnis, J. (2012) Estestvennoepravo i estestvennyeprava [Natural Law and Natural Rights.]. Moscow: IRISEN; Mysl'.
12.Coleman, J.L. & Leiter, B. (2010) Legal Positivism. In: Patterson, D. (ed.) A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
13.Yanal, R.J. & Dworkin, H. (1985) Judges and New Law. The Monist. 68 (3). pp. 388-402. DOI: 10.5840/monist198568333
14.Bix, B. (2010) Natural Law Theory. In: Patterson, D. (ed.) A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
15.Dworkin, R. (1967) The Model of Rules. The University of Chicago Law Review. 35 (1). pp. 14-46. DOI: 10.2307/1598947
16.Dworkin, R. (2004) O pravakh vser'ez [Taking rights seriously]. Translated from English by M.D.Lakhut' and L.B.Makeeva. Moscow: ROSSPEN.
17.Dworkin, R. (1986) Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.Leiter, B. (2001) Objectivity, Morality and Adjudication. In: Leiter, B. (ed.) Objectivity in Law and Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.Didikin, A.B. (2010) The formation of analytic tradition in the contemporary philosophy of law. Schole. Filosofskoe antikovedenie i klas- sicheskaya traditsiya. 4 (1). pp. 149-165. (In Russian).
20.Didikin, A.B. (2016) Analiticheskaya filosofiya prava: istoki, genezis i struktura [Analytical philosophy of law: origins, genesis and structure]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University.
21.Priel, D. (2008) Were the Legal Realists Legal Positivists? Law and Philosophy. 27 (4). pp. 309-350. DOI: 10.1007/s10982-008-9021-2
22.Ogleznev, V.V. & Surovtsev, V.A. (2013) Brian Bix and Analytical Legal Philosophy in USA. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universi-teta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya -- Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2 (22). pp. 206-210.
23.Ogleznev, V.V. & Surovtsev, V.A. (2016) Analiticheskaya filosofiya, yuridicheskiy yazyk i filosofiya prava [Analytical philosophy, language of law and philosophy of law]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University. pp. 126-142.
24.Leiter, B. (2001) Legal Realism and Legal Positivism Reconsidered. Ethics: An International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philoso-phy. 111 (2). pp. 278-301. DOI: 10.1086/233474
25.Leiter, B. (2003) Beyound the Hart/Dworkin Debate: The Methodology Problem in Juriprudence. The American Journal of Jurisprudence. 48 (1). pp. 17-51. DOI: 10.1093/ajj/48.1.297
26.Leiter, B. (2010) American Legal Realism. In: Patterson, D. (ed.) A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell.
27.Leiter, B. (2015) Legal Realism and Legal Doctrine. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 163. P. 1975-1984.
28.Didikin, A.B. (2008) Sovremennye interpretatsii naturalizma v analiticheskoy filosofii prava [Modern interpretations of naturalism in the ana-lytical philosophy of law]. VestnikNovosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Filosofiya -- Vestnik of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy. 6 (1). pp. 59-63.
29.Didikin, A.B. (2014) The limits of applicability of the arguments of W. Quine in legal epistemology. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya -- Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 4 (28). pp. 2632. (In Russian).
30.Bayles, M. (1991) Hart vs. Dworkin. Law and Philosophy. 10 (4). pp. 349-381. DOI: 10.1007/BF00127410
31.Dworkin, R. (1963) Judicial Discretion. The Journal of Philosophy. 60 (21). pp. 624-638. DOI: 10.2307/2023557
32.Fuller, L.L. (2017) Pozitivizm i vernost' pravu: otvet professoru Khartu [Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart]. Trans-lated from English. In: Ogleznev, V.V. & Surovtsev, V.A. (eds) Filosofiya iyazykprava [Philosophy and language of law]. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI Reabilitatsiya.
33.Summers, F. (1966) The New Analytical Jurists. New York University Law Review. 41 (5). pp. 861-896.
34.Coleman, J.L. (2011) The Architecture of Jurisprudence. The Yale Law Journal. 121 (1). pp. 2-80.
35.Koskenniemi, M. (1989) From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Helsinki: Finnish Lawyers' Publishing Company.
36.Raz, J. (1975) Practical Reason and Norms. London: Hutchinson.
37.Shapiro, S.J. (2007) The “Hart-Dworkin” Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 22-55.
38.Coyle, S. (2006) Positivism, Idealism and the Rule of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 26 (2). pp. 257-288. DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gql003
39.Hershovitz, S. (2015) The End of Jurisprudence. The Yale Law Journal. 124 (4). pp. 1160-1204.
40.Raz, J. (1985) Authority, Law and Morality. The Monist. 68 (3). pp. 295-324. DOI: 10.5840/monist198568335
41.Raz, J. (1972) Legal Principles and the Limits of Law. The Yale Law Journal. 81 (5). pp. 823-854. DOI: 10.2307/795152
42.Raz, J. (2003) About Morality and the Nature of Law. The American Journal of Jurisprudence. 48 (1). pp. 1-15. DOI: 10.1093/ajj/48.1.1
43.Ogleznev, V.V. (2016) Namerenie, deystvie, otvetstvennost' [Intention, action, responsibility]. In: Ogleznev, V.V. & Surovtsev, V.A. Analit- icheskaya filosofiya, yuridicheskiy yazyk i filosofiya prava [Analytical philosophy, language of law and philosophy of law]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University.
44.Ogleznev, V.V. (2014) Defeasibility and legal language: H.L.A. Hart in defense. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya -- Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2 (26). pp. 161-169. (In Russian).
45.Moiseev, S.V. (2007) “Ponyatie prava” Gerberta Kharta [“The Concept of Law” by Herbert Hart]. In: Hart, H.L.A. Ponyatieprava [The Concept of Law]. Translated from English. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University.
46.Cherry, C. (1974) The Limits of Defeasibility. Analysis. 34 (3). pp. 101-107. DOI: 10.1093/analys/34.3.101
47.Somlo, F. (1917) Juristische Grundlehre. Leipzig: Verlag von Felix Meiner.
48.Frankfurt, H.G. (1969) Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility. The Journal of Philosophy. 66 (23). pp. 829-839. DOI: 10.2307/2023833
49.Foot, P. (1981) Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 19-32.
50.Kane, R. (2005) A Contemporary Introduction to Free Will. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.Fischer, J.M., Kane, R., Pereboom, D. & Vargas, M. (2007) Four Views on Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.Haji, I. (2005) Compatibilist Views of freedom and Responsibility. In: Kane, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.Clarke, R. (2005) Libertarian Views: Critical Survey of Noncausal and Event-Causal Accounts of Free Agency. In: Kane, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.Pereboom, D. (2005) Living without Free Will: The Case for Hard Incompatibilism. In: Kane, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.Fischer, J.M. (2005) Frankfurt-type Examples and Semi-Compatibilism. In: Kane, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.Ekstrom, L.W. (2005) Libertarianism and Frankfurt-style Cases. In: Kane, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford Uni-versity Press.
57.Widerker, D. (2005) Responsibility and Frankfurt-type Examples. In: Kane, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.Mishura, A. (2016) Battlefield - free will. Logos. 26 (5). pp. 19-58. (In Russian).
59.Volkov, D.B. (2016) The problem of free will: an overview of major studies by analytical philosophers in late 20th - early 21st century. Filosofskiy zhurnal -- Philosophy Journal. 9 (3). pp. 175-189. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21146/2072-0726-2016-9-3-175-189
60.Fischer, J.M. (2008) Responsibility and the Kinds of Freedom. The Journal of Ethics. 12 (3/4). pp. 203-228. DOI: 10.1007/s10892-008-9032-0