25. Nahata B. et al. Application of Ramsey model in transition economy: A Russian Case Study // Energy Economics. 2007. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 105-125.
26. Nagayama H. Electric power sector reform liberalization models and electric power prices in developing countries: an empirical analysis using international panel data // Energy Economics. 2009. Vol. 31. P. 463-472.
27. OECD/IEA. Digitalization and Energy. OECD Publishing, Paris. 2017
28. OECD/IEA. World Energy Outlook 2018. OECD Publishing, Paris. 2018.
29. Ozog M. The Effect of Prepayment on Energy Use. 2013.
30. Pollitt M. Evaluating the evidence on electricity reform: Lessons for the South East Europe (SEE) market. 2009.
31. Proskuryakova L., Ermolenko G. The future of Russia's renewable energy sector: trends, scenarios and policies // Renewable Energy. 2019. Vol. 143. P. 1670-1686.
32. Qiu Y., Xing B., Wang Y.D. Prepaid electricity plan and electricity consumption behavior // Contemporary Economic Policy. 2016. Vol. 35. P. 125-142.
33. Sun C., Lin B. Reforming residential electricity tariff in China: Block tariffs pricing approach // Energy Policy. 2013. Vol. 60. P. 741-752.
34. Tayal D., Evers U. Consumer preferences and electricity pricing reform in Western Australia // Utilities Policy. 2018. Vol. 54. P. 115-124.
35. VanDoren P. The Deregulation of the Electricity Industry. A Primer. Cato Policy Analysis. 1998.
36. Verbic M., Filipovic S., Radovanovic M. Electricity prices and energy intensity in Europe // Utilities Policy. 2017. Vol. 47. P. 58-68.
37. Wang C., Zhou K., Yang S. A review of residential tiered electricity pricing in China // Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017. Vol. 79. P. 533-543.
38. Wang X., Lin B. Impacts of residential electricity subsidy reform in China // Energy Efficiency. 2017. Vol. 10. P. 499-511.
39. Wang Q., Jiang R., Zhan L. Is decoupling economic growth from fuel consumption possible in developing countries? - A comparison of China and India // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019. Vol. 229. P. 806-817.
40. Wijayapala W.D.A.S., Kankanamge T.N. Assessment of the impacts of electricity subsidies in Sri Lanka // Engineers: Journal of the Institution of Engineers. 2016. Vol. 49. P. 29-36.
41. Wu Y., Zhu Q., Zhu B. Comparisons of decoupling trends of global economic growth and energy consumption between developed and developing countries // Energy Policy. 2018. Vol. 116. P. 30-38.
Справочные материалы
1. Власти и энергетики пробуют снова решить проблему перекрестного субсидирования // Ассоциация гарантирующих поставщиков. - 2018.
2. В правительстве решают, как ликвидировать ценовую дискриминацию в электроэнергетике // Ассоциация гарантирующих поставщиков. - 2018.
3. В электроэнергетике необходимо всех вернуть обратно в рынок в 2023-2025 годах // Ведомости. - 2018.
4. В поиске блата. Введение соцнормы энергопотребления требует более тщательной проработки // Российская газета. - 2018.
5. Дали передышку // Эксперт. - 2019.
6. Дмитрий Васильев: избыточная нагрузка на потребителей от неравномерного распределения перекрестного субсидирования недопустима // Федеральная антимонопольная служба РФ. - 2018.
7. Жить будем плохо, но долго // Газета.ш. - 2017.
8. Золотова И.Ю. Перекрестное субсидирование в электроэнергетике: эмпирический анализ, оценка эффективности собственной генерации. 2017.
9. Крупный бизнес продолжит субсидировать электроэнергию для населения // Ведомости. - 2017.
10. Кабмин окончательно отказался от перехода на дифференцированные энерготарифы // ТАСС. - 2019б. На круглом столе комитета Государственной Думы по энергетике перекрестное субсидирование в электроэнергетике признали «пудовой гирей на ногах», мешающей развитию отрасли, и констатировали необходимость комплексного подхода к решению этого сложнейшего вопроса // Комитет Государственной Думы по энергетике. - 2018.
11. Нормы потребления электричества: что об этом следует знать // РИА Новости. - 2018.
12. Нормирование и реальное потребление электроэнергии домашними хозяйствами (социальный и региональный аспекты) // Прайм. - 2018.
13. МЭР разработало меры для снижения перекрестного субсидирования в электроэнергетике // ТАСС. - 2019а.
14. Обратный ток. Эксперимент по соцнормам на потребление электричества населением зашел в тупик // Российская газета. - 22.05.2016. - № 109 (6977).
15. Отчет о результатах экспертно-аналитического мероприятия «Анализ реализации пилотных проектов по введению социальной нормы потребления электрической энергии (мощности) в субъектах Российской Федерации» // Бюллетень Счетной палаты. - 2016. - № 8 (август).
16. Павел Сниккарс: перекрестное субсидирование в электросетевом комплексе необходимо ликвидировать // Энергетика и промышленность России. - 2017.
17. Перекрестное субсидирование: жечь свет за счет других // Газета.ш. - 2018.
18. Перекрестное субсидирование в электроэнергетике: итог пятнадцатилетней борьбы // Сколково. - 2013.
19. Плановая дискриминация.
20. Потрясающая неэффективность российской энергетики // Энерджиленд. - 2010.
21. Рекомендации круглого стола на тему «Вопросы перекрестного субсидирования в электроэнергетике, его влияние на развитие отрасли и экономику страны, меры по его минимизации» // Комитет Государственной Думы по энергетике. - 2018.
22. Сайт гарантирующего поставщика г. Москва // Мосэнергосбыт.
23. Семьи с доходом около 15 тыс. руб. смогут получить субсидии на ЖКУ // РБК. - 2018.
24. Electricchoice. Compare Electricity Rates, Plans, and Providers with ElectricChoice.com. 2018.
25. Origin Energy.
26. PJM.
27. Tokyo Electric Power Company. 2018.
References
1. Antonov, N. (2018). Normirovanie i real'noe potreblenie elektroenergii domashnimi hozyajstvami (sotsial'nyj i regional'nyj aspekty) [Rationing and Real Consumption of Electricity by Households (Social and Regional Aspects)]. IA «Praym», December 5, 2018.
2. Akkemik, K.A. & Oguz, F. (2011). Regulation, Efficiency and Equilibrium: A General Equilibrium Analysis of Liberalization in the Turkish Electricity Market. Energy, no 36, pp. 3282-3292.
3. Alvarez, J. & Valencia, F. (2015). Made in Mexico: Energy Reform and Manufacturing Growth. IMF Working Paper Western Hemisphere Department.
4. Assotsiatsiya garantiruyushchikh postavshchikov (2018). Vpravitelstve reshayut, kak likvidi- rovat' cenovuyu diskriminaciyu v elektroenergetike [The Government Decides How to Eliminate Price Discrimination in the Power Industry].
5. Assotsiatsiya garantiruyushchikh postavshchikov (2018). Vlasti i energetiki probuyut snova reshit'problemu perekrestnogo subsidirovaniya [Authorities and Specialists in Energetics Are Trying to Solve the Problem of Cross-Subsidization Again].
6. Bhattacharyya, R. & Ganguly, A. (2017). Cross Subsidy Removal in Electricity Pricing in India. Energy Policy, no 100, pp. 181-190.
7. Breisinger, C., Engelke, W. & Ecker, O. (2011). Petroleum Subsidies in Yemen: Leveraging Reform for Development. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5577. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
8. Burke, J. & Kurniawati, S. (2018). Electricity Subsidy Reform in Indonesia: Demand-Side Effects on Electricity Use. Energy Policy, no 116, pp. 410-421.
9. Casado, F., Hidalgo, M.C. & Garcia-Leiva, P. (2017). Energy Efficiency in Households: The Effectiveness of Different Types of Messages in Advertising Campaigns. Journal of Environmental Psychology, no 53, pp. 198-205.
10. Curtis, J., Graham, A., Ghafoori, E., Pyke, S. & Kaufman, S. (2018). Facilitating Adaptive Management in a Government Program: A Household Energy Efficiency Case Study. Journal of Environmental Management, no 187, pp. 89-95.
11. Drivas, K., Rozakis, S. & Xesfingia, S. (2019). The Effect of House Energy Efficiency Programs on the Extensive and Intensive Margin of Lower-Income Households' Investment Behavior. Energy Policy, no 128, pp. 607-615.
12. Ekspert (2019). Daliperedyshku [Given a Break].
13. Enerdzhilend (2010). Potryasayushchaya neeffektivnost' rossiyskoy energetiki [Stunning Inefficiency of the Russian Energy Sector].
14. Energetika i promyshlennost' Rossii (2017). Pavel Snikkars: perekryostnoe subsidirovanie v ele- ktrosetevom komplekse neobhodimo likvidirovat' [Pavel Snikkars: Cross-Subsidization in the Power Sector Should Be Eliminated].
15. Electricchoice (2018). Compare Electricity Rates, Plans, and Providers with ElectricChoice. com.
16. Erdogdu, E. (2011). The Impact of Power Market Reforms on Electricity Price-Cost Margins and Cross-Subsidy Levels: A Cross Country Panel Data Analysis. Energy Policy, no 39, pp. 1080-1092.
17. Eryilmaza, D. & Gafford, S. (2018). Can a Daily Electricity Bill Unlock Energy Efficiency? Evidence from Texas. The Electricity Journal, no 31, pp. 7-11.
18. EY (2018). Obzor elektroenergeticheskoy otrasli Rossii [Overview of the Russian Electric Power Industry].
19. Federal'naya antimonopol'naya sluzhba RF (2018). Dmitriy Vasilev: izbytochnaya nagruzka na potrebiteley ot neravnomernogo raspredeleniya perekrestnogo subsidirovaniya nedopustima [Dmitry Vasiliev: Excessive Burden on Consumers from Uneven Distribution of Cross-Subsidization is Unacceptable].
20. Gazeta.ru (2017). Zhit budemplokho, no dolgo [We Will Live Not Very Well but for a Long Time].
21. Gazeta.ru (2018). Perekrestnoe subsidirovanie: zhech' svet za schet drugih [Cross-Subsidizing: Burn Light at the Expense of Others].
22. Hattori, T. & Tsutsui, M. (2004). Economic Impact of Regulatory Reforms in the Electricity Supply Industry: A Panel Data Analysis for OECD Countries. Energy Policy, no 32, pp. 823-832.
23. Hiroto, S. & Shuichi, A. (2016). Analysis of Optimal Locations for Power Stations and Their Impact on Industrial Symbiosis Planning under Transition Toward Low-Carbon Power Sector in Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, no 114, pp. 81-94.
24. IMF (2013). Energy Subsidy Reform: Lessons and Implications. Paris: OECD Publishing.
25. Infrastrukturnyj tsentr EnergyNet (2019). Upravlenie sprosom v elektroenergetike Rossii: otkryvayushchiesya vozmozhnosti [Demand Management in the Russian Power Industry: Emerging Opportunities]. IEA biblioteka.
26. James, M. & Ambrose, M. (2017). Retrofit or Behaviour Change? Which has the Greater Impact on Energy Consumption in Low Income Households? Procedia Engineering, no 180, pp. 1558-1567.
27. Kavousian, A., Rajagopal, R. & Fischer, M. (2015). Ranking Appliance Energy Efficiency in Households: Utilizing Smart Meter Data and Energy Efficiency Frontiers to Estimate and Identify the Determinants of Appliance Energy Efficiency in Residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, no 99, pp. 220-230.
28. Kuosmanen, T., Saastamoinen, A. & Sipilainen, T. (2013). What is the Best Practice for Benchmark Regulation of Electricity Distribution? Comparison of DEA, SFA and StoNED methods. Energy Policy, no 61, pp. 740-750.
29. Littlechild, S. (2018). The Regulation of Retail Competition in US Residential Electricity Markets.
30. McMichael, M. & Shipworth, D. (2013). The Value of Social Networks in the Diffusion of Energy-Efficiency Innovations in UK Households. Energy Policy, no 53, pp. 159-168.
31. Moreau, V., De Oliveira Neves, C.A. & Vuille, F. (2019). Is Decoupling a Red Herring? The Role of Structural Effects and Energy Policies in Europe. Energy Policy, no. 128, pp. 243-252.
32. Mosenergosbyt (2018). Sajt garantiruyushchego postavshchika g. Moskva. Mosenergosbyt
33. Nagayama, H. (2009). Electric Power Sector Reform Liberalization Models and Electric Power Prices in Developing Countries: An Empirical Analysis Using International Panel Data. Energy Economics, no 31, pp. 463-472.
34. Nahata, B. et al. (2007). Application of Ramsey Model in Transition Economy: A Russian Case Study. Energy Economics, vol. 29, no 1, pp. 105-125.
35. OECD/IEA (2005). Uroki, izvlechennye iz liberalizacii rynkov elektroenergii [ Lessons Learned from the Liberalization of Electricity Markets].
36. OECD/IEA (2017). Digitalization and Energy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
37. OECD/IEA (2018). World Energy Outlook 2018. Paris: OECD Publishing.
38. Origin Energy (2019).
39. Ozog, M. (2013). The Effect of Prepayment on Energy Use.
40. PJM (2019).
41. Pollitt, M. (2009). Evaluating the Evidence on Electricity Reform: Lessons for the South East Europe (SEE) Market.
42. Qiu, Y., Xing, B. & Wang, Y.D. (2016). Prepaid Electricity Plan and Electricity Consumption Behavior. Contemporary Economic Policy, no 35. pp. 125-142.
43. RBC (2018). Sem'i s dokhodom okolo 15 tys. rub. smogut poluchit' subsidii na ZhKU [Families with Revenues of Around 15 Thousand Rubbles May Receive Housing Subsidies].
44. RIA Novosti (2018). Normy potrebleniya elektrichestva: chto ob etom sleduet znat' [Electricity Consumption Standards: What You Should Know About It].
45. Rossiyskaya gazeta (2018). V poiske blata. Vvedenie sotsnormy energopotrebleniya trebuet bolee tshchatel'noy prorabotki [In Search of Cronyism. Introduction of the Social Norm of Energy Consumption Requires More Careful Study].
46. Rosstat (2019). Standard of Life.
47. Skolkovo (2013). Perekrestnoe subsidirovanie v elektroenergetike: itogpyatnadcatiletnej bor'by [Cross-Subsidization in the Power Industry: the Result of Fifteen Years of Struggle].
48. Sun, C. & Lin, B. (2013). Reforming Residential Electricity Tariff in China: Block Tariffs Pricing Approach. Energy Policy, no 60, pp. 741-752.
49. Swain, A. & Charnoz, O. (2012). In Pursuit of Energy Efficiency in India's Agriculture: Fighting `FreePower' or Working with It? Agence Franзaise de Dйveloppement. Working Paper 126.
50. TASS (2019). Kabmin okonchatel'no otkazalos' ot perekhoda na differencirovannye energo- tarify [The Cabinet Finally Refused to Switch to Differentiated Energy Tariffs].
51. Tayal, D. & Evers, U. (2018). Consumer Preferences and Electricity Pricing Reform in Western Australia. Utilities Policy, no 54, pp. 115-124.
52. Tokyo Electric Power Company (2018).
53. Trachuk, A.V et al. (2017). Perekrestnoe subsidirovanie v elektroenergetike: problemy iputi resh- eniya [Cross-Subsidization in the Power Industry: Problems and Solutions]. SPb.: Real'naya ekonomika.
54. VanDoren, P. (1998). The Deregulation of the Electricity Industry. A Primer. Cato Policy Analysis.
55. Vassileva, I. & Campillo, J. (2014). Increasing Energy Efficiency in Low-Income Households Through Targeting Awareness and Behavioral Change. Renewable Energy, no 67, pp. 59-63.
56. Vedomosti (2017). Krupnyi biznes prodolzhit subsidirovat' elektroenergiyu dlya naseleniya [Big Business will Continue to Subsidize Electricity for the Population].
57. Vedomosti (2018). V elektroenergetike neobhodimo vsekh vernut' obratno v rynok v 20232025 godakh [In the Electric Power Industry It Is Necessary to Return All Back to the Market in 2023-2025].
58. Verbic, M., Filipovic, S. & Radovanovic, M. (2017). Electricity Prices and Energy Intensity in Europe. Utilities Policy, no 47, pp. 58-68.
59. Wang, C., Zhou, K. & Yang, S. (2017). A Review of Residential Tiered Electricity Pricing in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, no 79, pp. 533-543.
60. Wang, X. & Lin, B. (2017). Impacts of Residential Electricity Subsidy Reform in China. Energy Efficiency, no 10, pp. 499-511.
61. Wang, Q., Jiang, R. & Zhan, L. (2019). Is Decoupling Economic Growth from Fuel Consumption Possible in Developing Countries? - A Comparison of China and India. Journal of Cleaner Production, no 229, pp. 806-817.
62. Wijayapala, W.D.A.S. & Kankanamge, T.N. (2016). Assessment of the Impacts of Electricity Subsidies in Sri Lanka. Engineers: Journal of the Institution of Engineers, no 49, pp. 29-36.
63. Wu, Y., Zhu, Q. & Zhu, B. (2018). Comparisons of Decoupling Trends of Global Economic Growth and Energy Consumption Between Developed and Developing countries. Energy Policy, no 116, pp. 30-38.
64. Yang, C., Meng, C. & Zhou, K. (2018). Residential Electricity Pricing in China: The Context of Price-Based Demand Response. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, no 81, pp. 2870-2878.
65. Zolotova, I.Yu. (2017). Perekrestnoe subsidirovanie v elektroenergetike: empiricheskiy analiz, otsenka effektivnosti sobstvennoy generatsii [Cross-Subsidization in the Power Industry: Empirical Analysis, Evaluation of the Efficiency of Own Generation].